Asif munir Response on India’s allegations

On July 7, 2025, Asif munir response to India’s allegations that China provided “active support” during the May conflict. He called such claims “irresponsible and factually incorrect,” emphasising Pakistan’s defence capabilities

Munir’s recent comments combine ideological grandstanding with strong military messaging, targeting Kashmir, pointing fingers at India, and dismissing foreign intervention accusations. His promotion to Field Marshal in May underscores his elevated position in Pakistan’s power structure

Indian army retired colonel Ajay Raina tweeted after the response

India’s Stand

  • Nature of Allegation: India claimed that Pakistan used Chinese surveillance drones, intelligence inputs, and logistical support during border clashes in May 2025, particularly near the Line of Control (LoC).
  • India’s Security Officials: Unnamed Indian intelligence sources stated that Chinese technology and military infrastructure indirectly aided Pakistani troop movements and positions.
  • Strategic Concern: Indian defense analysts see this as a sign of deepening military collaboration between China and Pakistan, especially in contested regions like Gilgit-Baltistan.

Asif Munir response on India Allegation

  • Army Chief Gen. Asim Munir (now Field Marshal) strongly denied any Chinese involvement, calling India’s claims “factually incorrect and irresponsible.
  • Munir emphasised that Pakistan acted independently and did not require external military assistance.

China’s Position

  • China officially downplayed the situation, stating it “respects the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all countries” and urged both sides to maintain regional peace.
  • Beijing labelled the allegations as “unfounded and provocative,” seeking to avoid escalation with India.

Bilawal Bhutto remarks 

On July 5, Bilawal expressed uncertainty about the location of Jaish-e-Mohammad leader Masood Azhar and UN‑designated terrorist Hafiz Saeed, stating “we do not know where he is” and suggesting he could be in Afghanistan. His remarks sparked debate and speculation over whether this was a veiled message to India or a genuine acknowledgment of intelligence gaps

On July 6, Bilawal suggested Pakistan might deport “individuals of concern” to India as a confidence-building measure—conditional on reciprocal cooperation from New Delhi. This provoked sharp criticism from PTI, accusing him of compromising national security and “appeasing” India

Bilawal’s public diplomacy alternates between assertive (threats over water and counter-terrorism) and conciliatory, reflecting an attempt to balance domestic pressure with international diplomatic expectations.

Leave a comment